October 24, 1974ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,v.
) PCB 72—466
RAIL-TO-WATER TRANSFER CORP.,Respondent.
2d 482
where the Court struck down the penalty because the City had doneall it could to solve its environmental problems.
The changes in Phases I and III (for non-tweendeckers)
could technically have been completed before June 1972;the Phase II dust collection system was feasible before 1973;the coke piles could have been covered earlier •than they were.
However, on page 11 of
Respondent’s May 9, 1974, brief, RTW clearly includes the pan inits Phase II operations.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
I, Christan ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
