View Properties

PCB 75-417 01/14/76 Opinion and Order
M & S WOOD AND PAPER CORPORATION v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-35141
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Friday, February 7, 2003 02:42:26 PM CST
Friday, April 25, 2003 03:05:03 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 14 , 1976M & S WOOD AND PAPER CORPORATION,Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 75—417
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
  • The second alternative to the air curtain destructor
would be installation of a substantially more expensive incineratorcapable of meeting the requirements of Rules 202(b), 203(e) (5), and206(b).
  • The manufacturer of the air curtain destructor states that
smoke emission from the control device is Ringelmann #1 (20 opacity)or less; the requirement of Rule 202(b) is Ringelmann 1.5 or 30opacity.
  • We would note that the Chapter 2 Open Burning Rules, specifically
Rule 504, provides for open burning permits from the Ag...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0004.pdf
4
771196
No
Appears In: PCB 75-417
Preferred Version: PCB 75-417 01/14/76 Opinion and Order