View Properties

PCB 74-469 09/04/75 Opinion and Order
DEERE AND COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-34919
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Wednesday, February 5, 2003 03:19:22 PM CST
Thursday, May 22, 2003 02:17:06 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 4, 1975DEERE AND COMPANY,Petitioner,V.
  • ) PCB 74—469
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
  • During the time span
of the previous variances, Deere attempted to achieve compliance by switching its fuel from coal to number 2 fuel oiland installing a baffle system on the air furnaces in anattempt to reduce emissions.
  • 18 — 436
—2—The arbitrary and unreasonable hardship faced by Deerein this case revolves around the Company’s use of air furnaces to produce the malleable iron used in their foundry.
  • Deere also feels, however, that it must address
the alternatives it would face in the event that a feasiblemeans to comply...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0002.pdf
4
1219577
No
Appears In: PCB 74-469
Preferred Version: PCB 74-469 09/04/75 Opinion and Order