July 31, 1975ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Compiainant,v.
) PCB No.
The Complainant Environmental
Protection Agency (Agency) filed a Response in Opposition toSpringfield’s Motion on July 22, 1975, and Springfield fileda further Reply to that Response on July 23, 1975.
Springfield’s Reply
states that since the City of Springfield is acting as its owngeneral contractor, the contracts submitted as Exhibits toaffidavit with its ora’jinal motion show the uncontroverted factson which the Board may decide this preliminary issue.
(The
Civil Practice Act was cited by both parties.) We find insteadthat o...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf