Petitioner filed a post~-hearingbrief on May 17, 1974, The
Agency filed a reply brief on June 6, 1974.
Petitioner
contends that there is not an alternative source of cokeavailable to use in its blast furnaces, and without the ironproduced in the blast furnace it could not operate its steel-makingfacilities (R.
8, 9, 11 and 12).
In addition to coke, Petitioner’s coke plant also produces
coke oven gas which is used to supply heat during the cokingcycle and steam which is utilized in the blast furnace plant,ammonium sulfate which is sold as a fertilizer, tar which isu...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
