October 30, 1975ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,Complainant,v.
) PCB 74—213
SPINNEY RUN FARMS, Respondent.
The present remand now cures this jurisdictional
defect.
For reasons noted below we deny the Joint Motion on
its merits.
16 to conform to the new facility.
We must reject this
aspect of the Stipulation for, regardless of the relativemerits of the two schemes, the Board has heard no testimonynor received any evidence regarding the facility now proposed. For dissatisfied parties to now comeforward to propose a settlement after a final decision hasbeen made and without substantial new evidence is not only amisuse of the a...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
