) ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARDOctober 9, 1975My reason for dissenting in this case is because no datawere submitted by the Petitioner as to whether the present paintdischarge violates ambient air quality standards in the immediatevicinity of the source.
“fivefo c, -in aeapor~rvretaining
tonce whicn is 25 teet in nesgtir.
The Petitioner did not carrr ~ ~n~rd.en under Train and i
would have denied the Petition for! Christan L.
Moffety~/~rk
Iilino:Ls Pollution ~~ro1 BoardILLINOIS CENTRAL GULF RAILROAD,CENTRALIA SHOP, Petitioner,V.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
Respondent.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
