February 19, 1976THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY,Petitioner, ) v.
) PCB 75—381
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY, Respondent.
Flintkote misreads the intent of the
variance section of the Environmental Protection Act (Act).
The
Board does not grant variances with the intent to cover emergencysituations such as those presented in the record by Flintkote forthe purpose of justifying effluent volume of 125,000 gallons perday (R 59).
As was stated in the Opinion, the Board will hold Flintkote
to their current level of discharge while they are perfecting theirch...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
