April 8, 1976WINNETKANS INTERESTED IN PROTECTINGTHE ENVIRONMENT (WIPE), ) Petitioner,v.
) PCB 75—363
VILLAGE OF WINNETKA,Respondent.
As a basis for the Motion, Respondent contends that
it has a complete defense to the alleged permit violationbecause the grounds for denial of Respondent’s applicationwere failure to show compliance with Rule 203(g) (1).
Taken
one step further, the position of the Respondent seems tobe that since Rule 203(g) (1) was held to be invalidly adopted,a permit previously denied would issue by operation of lawand that the Agency and this Board are forever precluded fromany further in...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
