March 28, 1977ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,v.
) PCB 77-37
JOHN DAUBS, Respondent.
In making this determination the Board has
given considerable weight to the fact that although theAct does not require a Respondent to even file a writtenanswer, Respondent did file his Answer in compliance withSupreme Court Rule 181(a).
The Board also points out that
the new Procedural Rule 314(a) prohibits any party fromfiling a Request for Admission within 21 days after theComplaint has been filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Mr. Zeitlin dissented.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf