Board construed IPC’s Motion as a variance petition, assignedit docket no.
IPC
alleges that it will face a dilemma under its currentvariance if the Board acts in R75—5 prior to acting in R77-9because its variance would terminate, leaving it in violationof the standards, before resolution of its site-specificrule request.
This Opinion constitutes the findings of fact and conclusions
of law of the Board in this matter.
The
form of said certification shall be as follows:~T1—5u6 —3—CERTIFICATIONI (We), ____________________, having read and fullyunderstanding...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf