January 22, 1981VILLAGE OF FLANNA CITY, ) Petitioner,v~ ) PCB 8O~2O6ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENC~, ) RespondentCONCURRING OPINION (by D, Satche~l1):My reason for concurring in this case is that the variance forgross alpha particle activity was denied as being unproven, basedon evidence before the BoardsI would have granted the variance particularly to inform theresidents (Rule 313 D 1) that their water supply may contain moreradioactivity than is deemed in the Board~sPublic Water SupplyRules to constitute an acceptable risk level.
Because
of radium’s high relative biological effectiveness (BEE)Rule...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
