prior regulatory proceeding relating to Lake Clinton (R75—2) hadestablished a 96°Fabsolute limitation as alternative to thattemperature which would have been required pursuant to Rule 203(i)(4) of Chapter 3, the Board’s Water Pollution Rules and Regulations.
Water will be
withdrawn from one arm (the north fork) to cool the condensersand will discharge into the other arm (Salt Creek) of the lake.
At hearing, IPC updated and supplemented its demonstration
under Rule 203(i)(10) (which had been prese...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
