| PCB 82-012 04/15/82 Anderson Dissenting Opinion |
| AURORA METALS DIVISION, AURORA INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-30520
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Friday, December 6, 2002 12:27:15 PM CST |
| Thursday, June 12, 2003 04:21:17 PM CDT |
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 15, 1982AURORA METALS DIVISION, ) AURORA INDUSTRIES, INC., Petitioner,v.ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.- The Agency’s assessment is properly contained in an Agency
Recommendation, not in a motion to dismiss.- That is why the rule also contains “includes
but is not limited tofl..” before the specific listings.- I believe the Agency is correct in its expectation that the
Board would initially rule on its Motion to Dismiss. |
| Allowed |
| |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0001.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 309491 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 82-012
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 82-012 04/15/82 Anderson Dissenting Opinion
|