July 22, 1999KELLY-MAC PARTNERS,an Illinois partnership,Complainant,v.
ROBERTSON-CECO CORP.,
a foreign corporation,Respondent.
Second, for purposes of this order, the Board will treat the joint “stipulation of
extension of time” as a motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint.
at __.” Kelly-Mac’s response to the motion to dismiss is referred to
herein as “Resp.
Id.
According to the complaint, Kelly-Mac purchased the facility from CECO in early
1985. 415 ILCS 5/21(e) (1998). Kelly-Mac also alleges that CECO caused, threatened, orallowed water pollution in violation of Section 12(a) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/12(a) (1998)) andc...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
