View Properties

PCB 79-071 Opinion and Order 05/05/83
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CO. v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-30047
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Tuesday, November 26, 2002 02:46:21 PM CST
Tuesday, November 26, 2002 02:48:19 PM CST
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLuTION CONTROL BOARD
May 5, 1983MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING CO., ) Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 79—71
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.
  • Second, 3M questioned the Agency’s establishment of two
separate effluent limitations for what it called in the permitNnon_contact cooling water” (Attach.
  • The third challenged condition (Attach.
  • T3—1(a), ¶6) related
to twice—yearly monitoring for 19 designated parameters.
  • No further
arguments or comments have been received before or since theNovember 9, 1982 filing of the hearing transcript. The permitshall be reissued subject to lawful conditions.
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0007.pdf
4
576444
No
Appears In: PCB 79-071
Preferred Version: PCB 79-071 Opinion and Order 05/05/83