November 3, 1983MIDWEST SOLVENTS COMPANY OF ILLINOIS,Petitioner,V.
PCB 83—:L59
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONAGENCY, RespondentDISSENTING OPINION (by J.
Anderson):
I dissent because I believe that the use of the provisionalvariance mechanism in this case was improper in that it rendersmeaningless the two~stagedtime limits, of 45 days each, in Section36(c) of the Act.
To acknowledge ~up front” that the project is likely to
exceed 45 days is, in effect, a precomrnit:ment to an extension intothe second 45 day stage~The obvious purpose of Section 36(c) is to provide forproblems that best estimates show can be remedied within a45 d...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
