The City filed its variance petition January 24, 1983.
The City included the MCI-IA as a
party respondent in the case caption, and the proof of servicefor this amended petition indicated a copy had been sent to theMCHA.
Also, a copy of the certified mail receipt for
service of the variance petition upon the Authority was enclosed,as required by the Board’s March 24 Order,The Agency filed its Recommendation, urging denial of thevariance requested, on May 31, 1983.
The City’s denial of hearing/denial of due process argument
is based on the fact that it had been improperly described bythe City as a respondent, s...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
