View Properties

PCB 82-129 Concurring Opinion 01/13/83
WILL COUNTY PRODUCE COMPANY and S & T COMPANY v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-29575
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Thursday, November 21, 2002 09:33:10 AM CST
Thursday, November 21, 2002 09:36:44 AM CST
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 13, 1983WILL COUNTY PRODUCE COMPANY and ) S & T COMPANY, Petitioners,v.
  • ) PCB 82—129
t1~LINOISENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) AGENCY, ) Respondent.
  • This is a de minimus violation of the Noise Rules.
  • How often is a patio outside a beauty parlor used for hair
treatment and facials in the Illinois climate? With a longer period of time for the variance to run someof the refrigeration units might well wear out and be replacedby quieter units.
  • above Concurring Olinion
was filed on the day ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0003.pdf
4
184573
No
Appears In: PCB 82-129
Preferred Version: PCB 82-129 Concurring Opinion 01/13/83