| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
August 22, 1984DEAN FOODS, Petitioner,v, ) PCB 81—151ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.- 4—6).
- The majority opinion correctly states that a de novo
hearing should he allowed on the factual issue of whether ornot Dean Foods is providing the “best degree of treatment”(Opinion, p.- 5)~ Having ruled that the de novo hearing was
proper, the majority then excluded that ~vidence developed atthe hearing it had just stated was proper (Opinion, p.- 6Y.
- But here the majority agrees that the
issue was a factual one and properly the subject of a de_novahearing.. The evidence then develope... |
... 
