September 20, 1984CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY,Petitioner.
In requesting that the Variance Petition be dismissed,
Respondent argued that the Petitioner failed to: provide afeasible compliance plan; provide sufficient specific informationand contained false statements pertaining to the facility underreview; distinguish why the regulations are allegedly inappli-cable due to the uniqueness of the facility; and provide an airquality study to substantiate allegations of minimal environ-mental harm should Variance be granted.
Rev.
Stat.,
1983, ch0 111½,par.
Therefore,
Petitioner is directed to amend its Petition to satisfy therequirements of 35 ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
