View Properties

PCB 84-106 Opinion and Order 01/24/85
AMERICAN CAN COMPANY (HOOPESTON PLANT) v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-28695
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Thursday, November 7, 2002 09:33:03 AM CST
Thursday, November 7, 2002 09:34:12 AM CST
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
January 24, 1985AMERICAN CAN CCMPANY, ) (HOOPESTON PLANT)Petitioner, PCB 84—106V.
  • ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
  • Adm.
  • Code 215.204(b),
215.2O2~,and 35 Iii.
  • at 16).
  • Because the solvent-based materials
are air dried and the VOM concentrations low per unit of air,carbon adsorption and catalytic incineration would not achieveefficient economical VOM destruction (Id.). The only othercompliance mechanism is to offset the VOM emissions from one processwith lower than allowable emissions from another process. Acme Barrel v. IEPA, May 18, 198PCB 83-118. Mm. Code 215 App...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0001.pdf
4
903908
No
Appears In: PCB 84-106
Preferred Version: PCB 84-106 Opinion and Order 01/24/85