View Properties

PCB 84-162 Opinion 03/07/85
JANET HOESMAN and BYRON HOESMAN v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS, AND THE CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS
Handle: Document-28516
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Thursday, October 31, 2002 01:02:28 PM CST
Tuesday, August 24, 2004 04:22:00 PM CDT
Modified By:
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 7, 1985JANET HOESMAN and ) BYRON HOESMAN, Petitioners,v.
  • ) PCB 84—162
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFURBANA, ILLINOIS, AND THECITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS,Respondents.
  • For this reason, we would reverse the City Council in
that unsworn testimony does not provide “evidence” to support thedetermination below.
  • In so doing the Second Circuit equated site
suitability determinations with this Board’s determinations onvariances.
  • App.3d 1074, 1081—82 (1981),) As the factual criteria
involved in the County Board’s decision under Section39.2 are not substantially broader than th...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
PCB 84-162 Opinion 03_07_85.pdf
4
940217
No
Appears In: PCB 84-162
Preferred Version: PCB 84-162 Opinion 03/07/85