| PCB 84-162 Opinion 03/07/85 |
| JANET HOESMAN and BYRON HOESMAN v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS, AND THE CITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-28516
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Thursday, October 31, 2002 01:02:28 PM CST |
| Tuesday, August 24, 2004 04:22:00 PM CDT |
Modified By:
|
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
March 7, 1985JANET HOESMAN and ) BYRON HOESMAN, Petitioners,v.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OFURBANA, ILLINOIS, AND THECITY OF URBANA, ILLINOIS,Respondents.- For this reason, we would reverse the City Council in
that unsworn testimony does not provide “evidence” to support thedetermination below.- In so doing the Second Circuit equated site
suitability determinations with this Board’s determinations onvariances.- App.3d 1074, 1081—82 (1981),) As the factual criteria
involved in the County Board’s decision under Section39.2 are not substantially broader than th... |
| Allowed |
| |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| PCB 84-162 Opinion 03_07_85.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 940217 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 84-162
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 84-162 Opinion 03/07/85
|