May 2, 1985ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY, ) Complainant,v.
) PCB 79—145
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION ) and PHILIP CAREY COMPANY,Respondents.
That motion seeks “to overrule the Hearing
Officer’s denial of Celotex motions directed to discovery ofinformation concerning procedures to be used by Complainant incollecting, preserving and analyzing samples to be taken from theCelotex site (Motion, pp.
The Board notes that Celotex will
receive split samples from Cemplainant and that the HearingOfficer Order in no way restricts Celotex from acquiringinformation a...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf