the hearing held in this matter in 1983, Commonwealth EdisonCompany (“Edison”) admitted that this facility fell within par.
502a—2(c) as a “device ...
for sewage
disposal or treatment.” However, Edison reserved objections todecertification of this facility based on procedural infirmitiesand constitutional grounds. The arguments accepted by the Board in Santa Fesupporting its resolution of a constituilonilchallenge to a...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf