View Properties

PCB 85-051 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85
CITY OF AURORA v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-28056
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Monday, October 28, 2002 08:28:27 AM CST
Monday, October 28, 2002 08:30:20 AM CST
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 11, 1985CITY OF AURORA,Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 85—51
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY ) Respondent.
  • No
cross—examination was made.
  • A major assumption made by Dr.
  • A second problem with Dr.
  • Toohey’s testimony is his use of
the 50 uCi radium intake “threshold” in the face of an 8—year—oldboy getting cancer after a 9 uCi intake (R. 34). Thisimmediately raises a question as to possible lower “thresholdst’on even younger children and on infants. 65-65 The assumption as to water intake (one liter per day versustwo) seems highly questionable. ~cd ~DDorothy M....
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0005.pdf
4
309495
No
Appears In: PCB 85-051
Preferred Version: PCB 85-051 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85