| PCB 85-26 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85 |
| STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-28050
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Friday, October 25, 2002 03:56:56 PM CDT |
| Friday, October 25, 2002 03:59:19 PM CDT |
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 11, 1985STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.., INC.,Petitioner,v.LLLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY ) RespondentsCONCURRING OPINICN (by J..D.My reason for concurring is that the majority’s grant of theinstant variance does not protect Stauffer Chemical Co.- Since the Board majority had agreed to grant the variance it
seems to me it ought to have also granted relief for that “gap”of 133 days.- When industrial plants relocate to other states or when
management decides not to expand at an existing site thosedecisions may rest on the perception of sincere interest by theState ... |
| Allowed |
| |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0005.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 217100 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 85-026
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 85-26 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85
|