View Properties

PCB 85-26 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85
STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO. INC. v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-28050
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Friday, October 25, 2002 03:56:56 PM CDT
Friday, October 25, 2002 03:59:19 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
July 11, 1985STAUFFER CHEMICAL CO.., INC.,Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 85—26
LLLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY ) RespondentsCONCURRING OPINICN (by J..D.
  • Dume11e)~
My reason for concurring is that the majority’s grant of theinstant variance does not protect Stauffer Chemical Co.
  • Since the Board majority had agreed to grant the variance it
seems to me it ought to have also granted relief for that “gap”of 133 days.
  • When industrial plants relocate to other states or when
management decides not to expand at an existing site thosedecisions may rest on the perception of sincere interest by theState ...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0005.pdf
4
217100
No
Appears In: PCB 85-026
Preferred Version: PCB 85-26 Concurring Opinion 07/11/85