View Properties

PCB 85-177 / PCB 85-220 / 85-223 Dumelle Dissent 04/03/86
CITY OF COLUMBIA, WALTER BYERLEY, JR., BARBARA HEINLEIN, DANIEL HEINLEIN, HOMER STEMLER AND LORETTA STEMLER v. COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR AND BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ILLINOIS, INC. / BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ILLINOIS, INC. v. COUNTY OF ST.CLAIR, ILLINOIS, AND CITY OF COLUMBIA, JEAN ECKERT, MARCELLUS ECKERT, LANNY JACKSON, VICKY JACKSON, HARRY RAYMOND, HOMER STEMLER, AND LORETTA STEMLER (INTERVENORS) / CITY OF COLUMBIA, JEAN ECKERT, MARCELLUS ECKERT, LANNY JACKSON, VICKY JACKSON, HARRY RAYMOND, PATRICIA RAYMOND, HOMER STEMLER, AND LORETTA STEMLER v. COUNTY OF ST. CLAIR AND BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF ILLINOIS, INC.
Handle: Document-27772
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Wednesday, October 23, 2002 02:00:20 PM CDT
Wednesday, October 23, 2002 02:01:43 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
April 3, 1986CITY OF COLUMBIA, WALTER BYERLEY, JR.,BARBARA HEINLEIN, DANIEL HEINLEIN, ) HOMER STEMLER AND LORETTA STEMLER, ) Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 85—177
COUNTY OF ST.
  • 69-22
—2—DISSENTING OPINION (by J.
  • D.
  • Dumelle):
My reason for dissenting is that I would not have vacatedthe County decision but would have remanded the matter to theCounty of St.
  • One day
out of 120 days is less than 1. To me that is de minimus. Yet some of the landowners received timely notice.And all notices were sent registered mail. Yet with no record before it, it proceeds to make“fi...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
OCR0001.pdf
4
392282
No
Appears In: PCB 85-177 PCB 85-220 PCB 85-223
Preferred Version: PCB 85-177 / PCB 85-220 / 85-223 Dumelle Dissent 04/03/86