| PCB 86-053 11/20/86 Concurring Opinion |
| CENTRAL ILLINOIS UTILITY CO. v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-27216
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Tuesday, August 6, 2002 09:05:40 AM CDT |
| Thursday, January 9, 2003 10:56:41 AM CST |
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
November 20, 1986CENTRAL ILLINOIS UTILITY CO., ) Petitioner,v.ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.- I cannot fathom what purpose is served by the addition of
the condition.- Nothing is stated.
- Would the USEPA revoke the variance because it does not
contain a changed compliance plan with increments of progress? This condition does not pass thistest. |
| Allowed |
| SykutaJ |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| PCB 86-053C.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 226359 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 86-053
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 86-053 11/20/86 Concurring Opinion
|