responded by a letter dated June 27, 1988, received by the BoardJune 29, and copied to Overnite’s attorney.
Contrary to Overnite’s assertions, the Board did
not require “additional noise reduction procedures” by its April21, 1988 Opinion and Order.
It is sufficient for the purposes of this present proceeding
that Overnite comply with the Board’s January 8, 1987 InterimOrder and April 21, 1988 Opinion, and that Overnite adopt theSeptember 17, 1987 noise mitigation recommendations of its9 0—4 7 1 —2—cons...
Allowed
scantmp1
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
