January 5, 1989VILLAGE OF BROCTON, ) Complainant, ) v.
) PCB 88-133
ILLINOIS CEREAL MILLS,Respondent.
Specifically, 1CM claims that if Brocton may later file another
complaint based upon alleged violations which took place prior to the filingof the Complaint in this matter, 1CM will be “prejudiced by being called uponto repeat the discovery process and again prepare to defend against the vagueallegation of the complaint”.
Section 103.140(e) provides:
When ruling on a motion by complainant for voluntarydismissal of an action the Board shall, for reasonsstated in its O...
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
