June 22, 1989IN THE MATTER OF:3 & R LANDFILL, INC., ) AC 89—18(Docket No.
Specifically, the Board noted that
the administrative citation had been sent to James ~uirin.
Clam County contends that the citation was
properly served.
In fact, in that case
the Board held:The circumstances of this case amplyillustrate the need for careful adherence tothe Board’s procedural rules, particularlywith respect to az~tions involvingadministrative citations.
On May 8, 1989 3 & R filed its motion to dismiss in which
it raised, for the first time, its jurisdictional objection.
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
