View Properties

PCB 88-116 06/22/89 Anderson Dissenting Opinion
SEXTON FILING AND GRADING CONTRACTORS CORPORATION v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-24737
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Friday, June 7, 2002 09:09:33 AM CDT
Thursday, May 1, 2003 03:51:55 PM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
June 22, 1989SEXTON FILING AND GRADINGCONTRACTORS CORPORATION,Petitioner,v.
  • ) PCB 88—116
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.
  • There remain a few matters which deserve further comment in
this proceeding.
  • 6—7).
  • Sections 5, 22 and 27 are not mentioned; only Sections
21(d) and 21.1 are included).
  • Moreover, the core assumption upon
which the majority now grounds its holding (i.e., that thetechnical closure and post—closure requirements stand alone,without reference to determining closure and post—closure carecosts) flies in the face of the Board’s enunciated “Phase—inProvisions” as set forth o...
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
6.pdf
4
648205
No
Appears In: PCB 88-116
Preferred Version: PCB 88-116 06/22/89 Anderson Dissenting Opinion