| PCB 90-037 05/24/90 Forcade Dissenting Opinion |
| ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY v. NESCO STEEL BARREL COMPANY |
| |
| |
|
Handle:
|
Document-23785
|
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:55:15 AM CDT |
| Friday, April 25, 2003 10:29:50 AM CDT |
|
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
|
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
May 24, 1990ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCYComplainant,v.(Enforcement)NESCO STEEL BARREL COMPANYRespondent.- Regarding Count IV, the majority reaffirms that compliance
with the requirements of Section 31(d) is accomplished by actualnotice to the respondent during the discussions with the Agency.- Unfortunately, the Board has no facts before it.
- Since Nesco must carry the burden in its motion
to dismiss, I would deny the motion. |
| Allowed |
| scantmp3 |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| 18.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 247416 |
| |
| |
| No |
|
Appears In:
|
PCB 90-037
|
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 90-037 05/24/90 Forcade Dissenting Opinion
|