The Board’s Order of March 22, 1990 imposed default as the
appropriate remedy for Respondent’s repeated violations ofdiscovery deadlines set forth in Hearing Officer orders in thiscase.
The Village of Beecher
(“Village”) also alleges that the Village was working towardremedying the complained—of problem and that the Villagepossesses a meritorious defense to the charge.”The Board outlined the history of Respondent’s repeatedviolations of Hearing Officer discovery orders in the Board...
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf