View Properties

PCB 91-080 12/19/91 Forcade Concurring Opinion
PAUL ROSMAN v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-22455
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Friday, May 17, 2002 10:50:59 AM CDT
Wednesday, April 16, 2003 10:05:16 AM CDT
Modified By: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Locked By:
  • ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
December 19, 1991PAUL ROSMAN, ) Petitioner, PCB 91—80v.
  • ) (UST Reimbursement
Determination) ) ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTION AGEItCY, ) Respondent.
  • Specifically, the Act envisions the following two-step
review process: 1) first, a review of the application todetermine whether the applicant is eligible to access the Fundand what the appropriate deductible is pursuant to Section22.18(b) (a) of the Act, and 2) a review of the costs pursuant toSection 22.18(b) (d) (4) of the Act.
  • See Pulitzer v.
  • IEPA, PCB 90142
(December 20, 1990).
  • The two decisions are t...
Allowed
scantmp3
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
10.pdf
4
430936
No
Appears In: PCB 91-080
Preferred Version: PCB 91-080 12/19/91 Forcade Concurring Opinion