As for the Agency’s motion for summary judgment, the Board finds, as a matter of
law, that Watts’ significant modification permit application was properly denied.
Adm.
Code
814.104.
Pet.
at 1. On November 15, 1994, additional information was submitted to the
2Agency. Pet. at 3-4.MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTNow before the Board is the Agency’s February 4, 2000 motion for summary judgment. Resp. at 3. Moreover, Watts argues, a grant ofsummary judgment instead of proceeding to hearing on the issue of the propriety of theAgency’s reliance on past violations would act as res judicata and would operate as aninsu...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
