| PCB 92-031 09/17/92 Dissenting Opinion |
| CITY OF ROODHOUSE v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY |
| |
| |
Handle:
|
Document-20872
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Monday, May 6, 2002 11:24:03 AM CDT |
| Monday, May 6, 2002 11:25:15 AM CDT |
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
September 17, 1992CITY OF ROODHOUSE, )) Petitioner,v.) (Underground Storage TankILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL ) Fund Reimbursement)PROTECTION AGENCY, )) Respondent.denial letter of January 21, 1992 lists five matters beingdenied.- A: Mr.
- Oakley Normally the Agency does not pay for overnight
express charges unless it’s as a result of lab samples takenfrom the actual contamination site.- Q: Hearing Officer Rich So it’s comparisons to other similar
type of job sites? The Act is not a “make theclaimant whole” type of legislation. |
| Allowed |
| scantmp2 |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| OCR0006.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 1191806 |
| |
| |
| No |
Appears In:
|
PCB 92-031
|
Preferred Version:
|
PCB 92-031 09/17/92 Dissenting Opinion
|