June 4, 1992ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY, )) Petitioner, ) v.
) PCB 91—174
(Underground StorageILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL Tank Fund)PROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.
Additionally,
the Agency argues that the tank removal in this case does notconstitute “corrective action” under the statute.
The Agency’s interpretation ignores the
Board’s statement in Rosman that:13 4—4 1 2w)hile the Agency equates costs which are not relatedto corrective action with a “planned removal”, we failto see the correlation.
Although the Age...
Allowed
scantmp5
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf