| R 76-014 / R 76-019 02/07/80 Dumelle Dissent |
| IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT OF THE NOISE REGULATIONS, RULES 101, 205, 206
AND 209 |
| |
| |
|
Handle:
|
Document-19014
|
|
Owner:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| Wednesday, April 24, 2002 04:06:43 PM CDT |
| Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:26:15 AM CDT |
|
Modified By:
|
Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
|
| |
|
Locked By:
|
|
| - ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD
February 7, 1980IN THE MATTER OF:PROPOSED AMENDMENT ) R76~14,OF THE NOISE ) R76~19REGULATIONS, RULES 101, 205, 206 AND 209Dissenting Statement (by Mr.- It may have no •zoning classification because of
lack of local zoning or be in a Class C zone.- The argument of priority of location is often raised,
But in the example discussed above ownership may pre~datethe date of establishment of the forging operation.- Or from other types of noise other than forging such
as factory noise? I respectfully dissent on the PrI, Christan L.- Moffett, Clerk of the Illinois Pollution
Control Board,... |
| Allowed |
| scantmp1 |
|
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
|
| 13.pdf |
| |
| 4 |
| 299552 |
| |
| |
| No |
|
Appears In:
|
R 76-014
,
R 76-019
|
|
Preferred Version:
|
R 76-014 / R 76-019 02/07/80 Dumelle Dissent
|
... 
