The Board found that the alleged violations in the complaint were neither duplicitous nor frivolous, denied respondents’ motion to stay, granted respondent’s application for treatment of certain information as "not subject to disclosure," and accepted this matter involving a Cook County facility for hearing. The request for a pre-hearing conference was referred to the hearing officer for disposition.
This matter is before the Board pursuant to Section 31(d) of the Act (415 ILCS 5/31(d)(1998)) and Section 101.202 of the Board’s new procedural rules (35 Ill.
Comp.
at 4-9.
Respondent challenged the existence of a private right of action to recover cleanup costs in this
case in its November 21, 2000 complaint with the Chancery Division of the...
Allowed
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
