August 3, 1995PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, )) Complainant, ) v.
) PCB 95—91
(Enforcement—land)BELL SPORTS, INC.
Bell has
neither filed a motion to dismiss, or an answer to the complaintpursuant to unopposed motions for extension of time in which toanswer, which were granted by the Board.
In response, the Attorney General argues that under either
the Board’s frivolous and duplicitous procedural rule provision,Section 103.124 (35 Ill.
The complaint before the circuit court involves only one of the
parties, WHLI, while this case involves the two additionalparties, Bell and Will.
(1986), 112 Ill...
Allowed
scantmp6
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
