clarification, asking whether we considered an amended petitionas well as the original.
We do not think this added cost enough to justify the added
pounds of sulfur dioxide that a variance would allow to he put.
This points up the
desirability of drafting future regulations in terms of 502 emissionsrather than sulfur content in the fuel, but there is no showing thatthe actual alternative to episode use of the present coal is theburning of the hypothetical coal described.
REGINA E.
RYAN
CLERIK OF THE HOARD1 — 353
Allowed
scantmp5
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
