:•;a~•cti3, :19? The applicable law has been spelled out in prior Board decision:Swords v.
EPA, N 70—6 (Sept.2, 1970); City of Jacksonville v.
EPA,
N 70—30 (Jan.27, 1971); City of Winchester v.
EPA, U70—37 (Feb.
In the Valence case there is no allegation that
the petitioners are in any more difficult position to complywIth the law than is any other person in the waste disposa: business:hat the Valence petitIon asks in substance is a repeal of the.pen—burning restricticn, but the variance procedure is not intendedto authorize a repeal of what the statute provides.
The facts in Striegel’s Tree Service are not so shocking,
but we find ...
Allowed
scantmp5
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
