stated conditions and delineate further proof requirements for anyadditional extension.
But there is
little evidence in the record to support this suspicion, and on therecord itself, which is all we can rely on, we think Texaco hasshown that to require immediate compliance would impose an arbitraryor unreasonable hardship.
No one
has a right to destroy his neighbors simply because he makes pilesof money in doing it, The statutory variance test of unreasonablehardship is not satisfied by proof of hardship alone; it must bedemonstrated that the hardships of complying with the law are ...
Allowed
scantmp5
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
