View Properties

PCB 95-089 07/20/95 Order
EUGENE W.GRAHAM v. ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Handle: Document-16024
Owner: Site Administrator (User-2, admin:DocuShare)DS
Friday, December 28, 2001 11:11:01 AM CST
Friday, May 10, 2002 06:43:29 PM CDT
Modified By:
Locked By:
  • TT.T~TNOTSPOT.T.HTTON CONTROT, RflARfl
July 20, 1995EUGENE W.
  • GRAHAM, )
Petitioner,V.
  • ) PCB 95-89
) (UST Fund)TLLTNOTS ENVTPONMENTALPROTECTION AGENCY, ) Respondent.
  • As basis
for filing the motion the Agency states that petitioner presenteddifferent facts concerning the issues in its reply brief from itspost-hearing brief, and, misrepresented facts in the SupplementalRecord.
  • Petitioner argues that the motions should be
denied because they are an attempt to file a sur—reply oradditional arguments.
  • The
Agency states no authority which would allow it to file a surreply brief and the Agency is not askin...
Allowed
wilsonb
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
95-089072095.PDF
4
122617
No
Appears In: PCB 95-089
Preferred Version: PCB 95-089 07/20/95 Order