r’1~ty 15, 1980I)J:lRY ~1i:~”~’l~ TIll LI TY COMI)ANV,P~’L I.
I oner
v.
) PCB 80—43
1tLLINOI S ENVI RONNENTAL PROTRCTI ON ) AGENCY, Respondent.
In PCB 77—153, Petitioner had been granted a variance from
Rule 404(f) permitting a discharge of 10 mg/i ROD5 and 12 mg/isuspended solids.
These penalties
would he imposed despite Petitioner~s excellent performance in thepast: as shown by its discharge monitoring reports and the installationof a new treatment facility at a cost of $1.5 million. Ratherthan grant relief for five years as Peti...
Allowed
schroedk
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
