November 1, 2001BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE OFF-ROADTIRE COMPANY,Petitioner,v.
ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY,Respondent.
Finally, for the reasons articulated
below, the Board grants Bridgestone/Firestone’s request for stay of effectiveness.
Mot.
at 2 (emphasis added by Agency).
The Agency argues
that the Board’s rules allow a request for a stay to be included within a petition for review onlywhen a CAAPP permit denial is involved. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE’S RESPONSEBridgestone/Firestone argues that the motion to strike the stay of effectiveness should bedenied. at __.” Bridgestone/Firestone’s response to the motion to strike is cite...
Allowed
wilsonb
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
