a Motion to Dismiss was filed with the Hearing Officer, but thisMotion was not received by the Board until October 3, 1980.
The Supplemental
Complaint alleges the same type of violation of Rule 203 of Chapter8: Noise Regulations, although of later occurrence, as does theoriginal Complaint filed February 21, 1980.
Respondents would have had adequate time between August 4
and September 18 to prepare a defense against the supplementalallegation.
Allowed
schroedk
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
