ROGER L. YOUNG and ROMANA K. YOUNG v.
GILSTER-MARY LEE CORPORATION
The Board denied respondent’s motions to reply and to strike. The Board affirmed the hearing officers decision to admit evidence and opinion witness testimony.
Code 101.500(e). In this case, the Board does not believe that
the respondent will be prejudiced by not being allowed to reply. In Kochanski, the Board ruled that a letter attached to abrief describing the qualifications of an engineer who performed a noise study would not beconsidered. Furthermore,because the Board denies the motion to strike, the Board need not consider respondent’s motionfor sanctions. Adm. Code101.626(a). All the evidence which respondent asked the hearing officer not to admit isadmissible under the Boar...
Allowed
wilsonb
Adobe Portable Document Format (.pdf) - application/pdf
... 
